Page 1 of 1

Artist of the Decade

Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:01 am
by Caleb
As we draw closer to the end of the Zeros I have seen some musician's stock rise very high and other's plummit (a la Britney Spears). Who (Whom) has had a great decade? Who has had a horrible decade? Just like ESPN's Who's Now? on, as well as off the field play, can be taken into account.

I am going to go with Modest Mouse and Maroon 5. MM has come so far and while people will push the sellout argument, I personally feel that they have furthered the indie genre as far as mainstream acceptance goes.

Maroon 5 i know next to nothing about. But they are fucking every where and young girls, 20 somethings girls and older women all sweat them ( or its seems that way to me). While their music may not be totally in line with my taste, I feel like one could do a lot worse.

Ryan Adams

Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 9:43 pm
by R.A.
Ryan Adams

Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 12:25 am
by ScS
the shins

Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 6:54 am
by putty
Kanye West, Wilco, Jimi Hendrix

great decade

Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 9:38 pm
by Phrazz
I'm not sure I understand your question, but I'd say Radiohead for starters. The White Stripes? Madonna? She's surely had a great decade...or two. I could do better if you'd throw some colors in with the wash.

BTW, for all you grammarians out there, the usage of "who" vs "whom" is fascinating. "Who" is subjective and "whom" is objective. If you start a sentence with it, you almost always use "who". Who gave Fred the guitar. If it's "of whom you are speaking", that is still objective in essence (the target of the verb in a sense). "Ask not for whom the bell tolls" is another good example. If it's the target of a preposition, also use whom. Such as "about whom it was written, on whatever it is they write it on down there" (Zappa reference, in case anyone was snoozing).

http://bartleby.com/64/C001/078.html

http://www.edufind.com/english/grammar/rel4.cfm

Now, some would say it's pedantic to talk about grammar at all, and formally, I cannot argue against that point. However, folks who have taken the time to learn how to use any language's grammar properly are going to increase both their knowledge and patience. We all know learning is pedantic ... there will always be those who are opposed to learning. It takes great courage to stand in the face of mixed metaphors and kill birds with rolling stones that gather no bushes. If you understand half of that, I have a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn.

Speaking of which....

Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:27 am
by magpie
oh phrazz you crack me up...

i love your turtle.

and to steer this back to topic i'll vote for radiohead too.

Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:08 pm
by Colin
radiohead....
done

Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:17 pm
by R.A.
Yeah, I was going to say Radiohead, too, but at first I thought the question was about bands that got their start in this decase. Then I realized Modest Mouse started in the early 90s. So I'd vote for Radiohead, too.

Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 2:53 pm
by tyler
Uh Radiohead started before Modest Mouse did anyway...?

Modest Mouse hasn't really been anything special since The Moon & Antarctica. That album was incredible, but Good News was fairly average and the new one sucks. They're basically just an angry Franz Ferdinand, these days.

Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 6:44 pm
by Colin
i think franz ferdinand is garbage, not to offend anyone

Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 7:05 pm
by BrentW
I am sure I'll get slammed since I don't dig these other bands mentioned but for me my vote goes to Medeski Martin and Wood. I fruking love those guys and they just keep pumping out new songs that torch my soul.

WHAT ABOUT THE SLIP???? I think they have had an incredible decade.

And hey, this decade gave us the birth of Surprise Me Mr Davis.

Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 11:59 am
by putty
Outkast

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 11:16 am
by Colin
beastie boys




but i doubt it